Assess together.
Improve the project.
An evaluation and learning space to understand how a development project addresses conflict, climate and gender, and identify possible improvements.
From project to improvement plan
The PACIFICA questionnaire brings together at least four people to examine a theme, discuss evidence and identify improvements. A separate document analysis is available through the Navigator.
Identify the project
Name, country, context, intervention phase and existing documents: logical framework, risk analysis and stakeholder consultation.
Respond as a committee
Discuss each criterion, agree on an answer and record the supporting evidence.
Review and improve
Read the results by dimension, identify gaps, document corrective actions and reassess at different stages of the project.
Three complementary perspectives on each project.
🕊️ Conflict sensitivity
Context analysis, stakeholder mapping, dividers and connectors, unintended harm risks, feedback mechanisms and adaptation.
🌿 Climate and resilience
Climate risks, vulnerabilities, emissions and unintended effects, early warning systems, adaptation and local capacity.
◉ Gender and inclusion
Analysis of inequalities, practical needs and strategic interests, participation in decisions, disaggregated indicators and learning.
This questionnaire helps prepare your committee. A collective evaluation recognised by e-Peace requires an e-Peace representative to attend and validate it after the session. Entering a name does not confirm attendance or award a label.
Request a session with e-Peace →Assess your project, one theme at a time.
Choose a dimension: conflict, climate or gender. Each produces its own results.
PACIFICA collective questionnaire
Answers and selected files remain in this browser during the session. Download your results to keep a copy.
Project details and theme to assess
Which evaluation method do you choose?
Selected dimension: —. Continue as a committee or open the document assessment.
Committee questionnaire
A mainstreaming committee of at least four people answers questions on the chosen theme, records discussions and attaches evidence. Committee membership is required.
Document assessment
Review project documents with the e-Peace Do No Harm Navigator.
Open the Navigator →Mainstreaming committee — at least four people
Enter a different person for each of the four required roles. You can add further participants in the final report.
Please enter four different people, one for each required role.
e-Peace AI · Project analyst
Upload one complete document or several documents for the project. The AI engine will analyse them together to answer each question on the chosen theme, cite evidence, identify gaps and calculate the score. No committee is required for this path.
Free lab · PACIFICA
Try without an account or payment using three entirely fictional projects. Results are predefined scenarios illustrating scores, questions and recommendations. They are not AI-generated and do not certify any real project.
Results include the selected file’s name. The file stays on your device.
Indicative results
The three separate proposed labels are PACIFICA Conflict, PACIFICA Climate and PACIFICA Gender. The score alone does not award certification. “Negative” and “transformative” classifications require analysis of actual effects.